Global Warming v. Natural Climate Change

Posted by: admin on Friday, October 23rd, 2009

The choice is obvious. Yet, there are some who still believe the farce of global warming as a human generated problem for which we must find a solution. The reality? There may be natural climate changes happening on the planet – which follows through the evolutionary theory of development. Or it could be a God given result of sin as indicated in the bible.

******************ADVERTIZEMENT********************

Shop until you drop…

You don’t have to leave the comfort of your own home to shop. Stay right there, and click on the link below. Better yet, share this opportunity with your friends and family and earn while they shop. Tell your friends.

The Best of Online Shopping

*******************************************************

Remember the flood? God had experienced enough of man’s ire, and took his people aboard the ark, to save the earth. The firmament rained down and the earth expanded to absorb the waters of the heavens. Polar ice caps were created and for many months, the land of earth was covered by water. A radical change of creation disrupted creations perfection and set about a course of action that ultimately would result in demolition of the planet — aka. natural climate change. The book of Revelations discusses the end times in depth.

Earth quakes, tornadoes, hurricanes and other weather phenomena were discussed in depth, as were the political issues of the day. This day? We don’t know. There have been talks about the end of time coming, since the beginning of time. The Bible says we won’t know the day or the hour.

Still, current discussion about One World Order and the president of the US signing into action a Global Warming or Climate Management Treaty that will enslave the people of the United States to third world nations because of economic success seem extremely radical. In fact, the concept feels wrong, on many fronts, but the one area of concern is not necessarily the creation of a One World Order, but rather the question of who manages the world. Currently, in a world where leaders rise and fall according to their ability to manage their own people, affairs, and land, the line of command seems definable. However, world wide leadership falling into the hands of the many at the helm of the UN, who have had difficulty just doing their jobs of late, seems a bit less organized and more difficult.

Perhaps technology has moved too far, too fast, and those in power have too much power? The alternative is giving them total control? I don’t think so. I believe there’s still a point of return, and I believe that point is when we the people stand and say, “Enough is Enough!”

 

Leave a Comment